I want to make a list of reasons why cars, roads, etc. are really bad for the world. I don't mind if the list is very long, but I'm hoping each of the items will be short, easy to understand, and convincing. The list will be in order from most to least important. Obviously, it is very hard to assign "importance," so I'm going to use my estimate of economic impact as a proxy. Eventually, I'd like to find some real data/analysis for as many items as possible. I think some of the items are virtually impossible to assign a value to, so I'm going to make some pretty arbitrary judgment calls. I do think the top three are in the correct order. Also on the to do list: write expanded posts for each item, make a dependency map between items, expand the list, refine the list, and make the list into a huge poster to bring with me as a prop when I'm on Oprah.
- Dead and maimed people
- Traffic
- Global warming
- Expanding roads after buildings are built around them requires herculean effort
- Roads are hard to build above, below, or through the ground this makes many common things significant obstacles: water, mountains, canyons, gorges, valleys, other roads, and buildings
- Emissions related health problems
- Cars don't drive themselves, wasting the drivers time
- Cars sit unused most of the time
- Cars are expensive to own
- Cars do not age well
- Parking lots and garages waste space and money (thanks Elnatan)
- Time is wasted searching for parking
- Maintenance of heavily trafficked roads causes delays
- Cars do not adapt well to harsh weather
- Cars are noisy
- Low maximum speed
- Roads divide wildlife territory
- Cars kill wildlife
Please send additions, refinements, or questions via the comment link below.
5 comments:
Your only mention of parking is that it wastes time. What about the fact that huge amounts of land are used (or wasted) for parking lots?
The projected economic costs of climate change are significantly greater than the economic costs from car accidents (deaths). Depending on discount rate and time frame, deaths might be a cost saving event.
Similarly depending on discount rate, climate change costs, especially if ecosystem services are valued, are likely much larger. If climate change, which is largely attributable to fossil fuel use, happens to a large degree, we are likely to lose several currently free economic services. Look up bee extinction as an example.
In other words, I think your list is out of order.
I think that most people would strongly object to ari's apparent suggestion that deaths from car accidents might be desirable.
To clarify: I believe that the economic costs that are brought about by transit related climate change are significantly greater than the costs brought about by transit related deaths.
There is a good scientific american article that interviews three people about estimating the costs of coping wtih climate change. 1% of global gdp is a conservative estimate.
article
In economic terms, I doubt that traffic related deaths account for 1% of global gdp. If transit is responsible for 10% of climate change, then .1% of global gdp is still a massive number.
On the other hand, I'm willing to conede deaths have a greater than purely economic cost. I would order the list differently, but josh's version is fine.
May I suggest you split your list in two, one for "personal vehicles" and one for "gasoline-powered internal combustion engines". As I often note on my blog (www.HoustonStrategies.com), I believe the personal vehicle is now a permanent part of society (vs. some sort of mass shift to transit), but the energy system that drives it is up for all sorts of technological change, to address the various issues of pollution, climate change, peak oil, etc. Examples might include plug-in hybrids, or maybe even rooftop solar panels that pull hydrogen off of water or natural gas lines to fuel the car in your garage, with the combustion by-product being clean water.
Recent articles suggest computer automation may soon address some of the other issues on your list (safety, speed, closer freeway spacing = less congestion, etc.), but we shall see.
Post a Comment